According to
feature.xml
(updated recently) it is licensed under Apache 2, but there is also
licensing.txt
(not touched in years) which says different things.
Which one is correct ? Specifically, I’m interested in terms of use for
icons
.
According to
feature.xml
(updated recently) it is licensed under Apache 2, but there is also
licensing.txt
(not touched in years) which says different things.
Which one is correct ? Specifically, I’m interested in terms of use for
icons
.
I’m not in a position to state this officially, but I would trust the newer information, and I don’t see the point of not licensing the Visual Editor freely.
For the icons, as the designer of them, I would just be happy if you find some other use for them also
But as I said, I can’t state this officially. I’ll try to get an official statement here also, and maybe get a fix to the ambiguous license texts in the repo.
The doc directory was out of date, the correct license for the current version is Apache 2.0.
I removed the doc directory from version control.