Get started
Loading...
Important Notice - Forums is archived

To simplify things and help our users to be more productive, we have archived the current forum and focus our efforts on helping developers on Stack Overflow. You can post new questions on Stack Overflow or join our Discord channel.

Product icon
TUTORIAL

Vaadin lets you build secure, UX-first PWAs entirely in Java.
Free ebook & tutorial.

Where to include a web components css file when integrating a third party w by Martin Vyšný, 1 week ago
Recent Posts
Vaadin Forum4. Other

Wicket framework extensions in Java

Eelco Hillenius
1 decade ago Mar 25, 2010 4:10pm

Hi,

Vaadin looks awesome, nice job.

One thing I don't agree with though is that in the feature matrix, item: 'Framework extensions are done in Java', Wicket is not marked. I believe it should be, because pretty much everything you can extend in Wicket, be in components, session storage strategies, urls handlers, you name it, is done through plain old Java. Would you agree?

Joonas Lehtinen
1 decade ago Mar 25, 2010 4:27pm

Hi. Valid concern - the title 'Framework extensions are done in Java' is not too well worded. This means that the framework can be extended by adding new rich widgets to it in Java. Maybe we should split the row to two parts: "client-side extensions to framework" and "server-side extensions to framework"? In this case - server-side extensions to wicket are done in Java (HTML templates are still not Java in Wicket).

Jens Jansson
1 decade ago Mar 25, 2010 7:05pm

The splitting sounds like a good idea. We have to give credit where due, and keep the matrix as truthful as possible.

Joonas Lehtinen
1 decade ago Mar 25, 2010 10:12pm

We have to give credit where due, and keep the matrix as truthful as possible.

101% agreed.

I hope to find some time to make the matrix more complete in other respects as well in coming weeks. All suggestions regarding wicket or any other framework would be great. (at least we should add zk5 to the matrix).